Now here’s one item in The Guardian that’s really worth reading:
We should not have put the headline “Israel admits harvesting Palestinian organs” on a story about an admission, by the former head of the Abu Kabir forensic institute near Tel Aviv, that during the 1990s specialists at the institute harvested organs from the bodies of Israeli soldiers, Israeli citizens, Palestinians and foreign workers without getting permission from the families of the deceased (21 December, page 15). That headline did not match the article, which made clear that the organs were not taken only from Palestinians. This was a serious editing error and the headline has been changed online to reflect the text of the story written by the reporter.
How, I wonder, could such an error have been made?
“How, I wonder, could such an error have been made?”.
They probably took some tips from the Daily Mail - they always have mis-leading headlines when Muslims are involved…and even when they aren’t involved.
The British press is certainly from the gutter.
In the Guardian article itself, they cite PressTV as the source of their information. PressTV is owned and run by the Iranian government. So the Guardian is publishing information about what happens in Israel which it obtains from Iran. Nice.
Perhaps Iran got its information from BBC Persia