<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times Perpetuates &#8220;Jewish Power&#8221; Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.z-word.com/2009/12/financial-times-perpetuates-jewish-power-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/12/financial-times-perpetuates-jewish-power-myth/</link>
	<description>Commentary about Zionism, anti-Zionism, antisemitism and the conflict in the Middle East</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5-RC1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Petra</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/12/financial-times-perpetuates-jewish-power-myth/#comment-8870</link>
		<dc:creator>Petra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1483#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>By coincidence, I just read an article in the FT by Chris Patten, who bemoans that in the debate of the EU's Mideast policy, the original Swedish proposal was challenged by some EU members "Acting seemingly on instruction from Israel's foreign ministry" -- you see how immensely powerful Israel is? We can even "instruct" some EU members what to do. I wonder if anybody "instructed" Sweden on how to write its proposal? 
Anyway, Patten's piece is worth a read:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/91a8f82e-e8e4-11de-a756-00144feab49a.html

-- it's clear that for him, Israel is the one and only obstacle to peace in the Mideast; apparently he doesn't think that there was any problem with the "Al Aksa intifada" -- except for Israel's response, of course; and regrettably, he apparently has never ever heard of Olmert's proposals last year to Abbas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By coincidence, I just read an article in the FT by Chris Patten, who bemoans that in the debate of the EU&#8217;s Mideast policy, the original Swedish proposal was challenged by some EU members &#8220;Acting seemingly on instruction from Israel&#8217;s foreign ministry&#8221; &#8212; you see how immensely powerful Israel is? We can even &#8220;instruct&#8221; some EU members what to do. I wonder if anybody &#8220;instructed&#8221; Sweden on how to write its proposal?<br />
Anyway, Patten&#8217;s piece is worth a read:<br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/91a8f82e-e8e4-11de-a756-00144feab49a.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/91a8f82e-e8e4-11de-a756-00144feab49a.html</a></p>
<p>&#8211; it&#8217;s clear that for him, Israel is the one and only obstacle to peace in the Mideast; apparently he doesn&#8217;t think that there was any problem with the &#8220;Al Aksa intifada&#8221; &#8212; except for Israel&#8217;s response, of course; and regrettably, he apparently has never ever heard of Olmert&#8217;s proposals last year to Abbas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

