This is a guest post by Dave Rich of the Community Security Trust in the UK.
CST has long been known for recording and analysing antisemitic hate crimes: the physical assaults, desecrations, racist abuse and hate mail that make up a quantifiable measure of antisemitism. But just as, in recent years, it has become increasingly apparent that antisemitism is not restricted to the activities of street thugs and bar room racists, so it has become necessary to chart that other sort of antisemitism: the ideas, images and language that occasionally pollutes public discourse. Last year, CST published its first Antisemitic Discourse Report, which attempted to identify, catalogue and analyse examples of this kind of antisemitism from 2007. Now CST has published its second such report, covering 2008.
Often, the antisemitic discourse covered in this report reveals unthinking stereotypes and prejudice, rather than something more considered. Lazy journalism can lead to what David Hirsh called “ready-made ways of thinking about Jews”. Some of the UK media coverage of the American presidential election, which is included in the report, falls into this category. Other examples in the report, such as Press TV’s promotion of Holocaust Denial, are more sinister; still others, such as Alan Hart claiming that Jews live in communities so that they can form voting blocs (rather than, for example, wanting to live within walking distance of their synagogue), are bizarre. Often, it is only by revisiting what antisemites used to say openly - such as in the 1960s British Nazi poster at the bottom of this post - that the antisemitic resonance of contemporary discourse can be fully understood.
One continuing problem is the way that extremist and racist ideas find easy platforms on mainstream media websites, blogs and forums. There is no simple answer to this, but one needs to be found. The first step is to identify and map the problem, and we hope that CST’s report adds to this effort.
“…still others, such as Alan Hart claiming that Jews live in communities so that they can form voting blocs (rather than, for example, wanting to live within walking distance of their synagogue), are bizarre.”
Not bizarre at all if one notes that antisemitism is about delegitimizing even normal rights that other individuals and peoples have.
Hence, it is normal for groups of people to want to live around each other because they enjoy each others company (the Irish in Boston, for example, or Arabs in Michigan, or Wes Indians in Queens, etc).
When it comes to Jew the reason must be something sinister.
There is a small step from delegitimizing the rights of Jews to live together in neighborhoods to delegitimizing the rights of Jews to live in peace in their own nation State.
The CST Antisemitic Discourse Report 2008 doesn’t take long [starts on p.13] to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. How can anyone take shoddy work like this seriously? There are legitimate objections many of us — Jews included — have to Israel’s actions and, I’m sorry, but it’s brutally frank criticism of a nation that uses land theft and martial law to promote a form of 19th Century nationalism.
Dave,
You win the “Acceptable Jew of the Month” award for August. Clap! Clap!
David,
You, rightly, claim that there are legitimate objections many of us — Jews included — have to Israel’s actions. However, legitimate objections and/or criticisms of Israeli policies and/or actions does not constitute anti-Zionism.
Anti-Zionism would be the denial of Israel to exists as a predominantly Jewish country. Which is, IMHO, a far cry from having legitimate objections and/or criticisms of Israeli policies and/or actions.
Of course, too many of those who purport to merely have legitimate objections and/or criticisms of Israeli policies and/or actions are really hiding (none to well) their real sentiments when they hold Israel to standards they don’t apply to anybody else.
Legitimate objections and/or criticisms of Israeli policies and/or actions is quite frankly something that every pro-Israeli should embrace. But, unfortunately, not all objections and/or criticisms of Israeli policies and/or actions are legitimate. When they aren’t they, more often then not, are based on antisemitism.