<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State and the Burqa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/</link>
	<description>Commentary about Zionism, anti-Zionism, antisemitism and the conflict in the Middle East</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5-RC1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stigmatising Dress Codes. &#171; ModernityBlog</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-11108</link>
		<dc:creator>Stigmatising Dress Codes. &#171; ModernityBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-11108</guid>
		<description>[...] Ages ago I detailed my opposition to this type of proposal in a post at the Z-word blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ages ago I detailed my opposition to this type of proposal in a post at the Z-word blog. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandering To Prejudice In France. &#171; ModernityBlog</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-9473</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandering To Prejudice In France. &#171; ModernityBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-9473</guid>
		<description>[...] as I argued previously at Z-blog, implementing a ban is in many ways implementing a dress code. It is telling people what they can or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] as I argued previously at Z-blog, implementing a ban is in many ways implementing a dress code. It is telling people what they can or [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miriam</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5628</link>
		<dc:creator>miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5628</guid>
		<description>In Turkey, certain forms of Muslim headgear were forbidden when Ataturk tried to force the country to modernize.  It worked, up to a point, but now the Muslimists are back in force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Turkey, certain forms of Muslim headgear were forbidden when Ataturk tried to force the country to modernize.  It worked, up to a point, but now the Muslimists are back in force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5598</guid>
		<description>modernityblog, you say

"Education and campaigning are the solutions. Not crude laws."


But why do we have to choose and why do you say "crude laws?" Are you a lawyer?


We need both education and laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>modernityblog, you say</p>
<p>&#8220;Education and campaigning are the solutions. Not crude laws.&#8221;</p>
<p>But why do we have to choose and why do you say &#8220;crude laws?&#8221; Are you a lawyer?</p>
<p>We need both education and laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modernityblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5562</link>
		<dc:creator>modernityblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5562</guid>
		<description>Lynne T, 

My facilities permitting I do try and read everything that people write, but maybe I don't see it in the same way? :)

I don't disagree with your comments.

If you want my solution, and I've had time to think a bit:

a new feminist movement, that and women's outreach programs will be the only real way of combating repressive clothing etc.

Laws won't do it, the women just won't leave the house, and a false sense of achievement will be felt in the wider society.

Education and campaigning are the solutions. Not crude laws. 

PS: Douglas, we'll see eh? 

So a burqa wearer (supposing that someone actually chooses to wear one, on their own), will be able in the US: to dress up like a Nazi, spout the speeches of Hitler, all of that and more, later, go get a gun, go hunting, kill little animals, but not wear a bit of clothing (the burqa)...

do you see the contradictions there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynne T, </p>
<p>My facilities permitting I do try and read everything that people write, but maybe I don&#8217;t see it in the same way? :)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with your comments.</p>
<p>If you want my solution, and I&#8217;ve had time to think a bit:</p>
<p>a new feminist movement, that and women&#8217;s outreach programs will be the only real way of combating repressive clothing etc.</p>
<p>Laws won&#8217;t do it, the women just won&#8217;t leave the house, and a false sense of achievement will be felt in the wider society.</p>
<p>Education and campaigning are the solutions. Not crude laws. </p>
<p>PS: Douglas, we&#8217;ll see eh? </p>
<p>So a burqa wearer (supposing that someone actually chooses to wear one, on their own), will be able in the US: to dress up like a Nazi, spout the speeches of Hitler, all of that and more, later, go get a gun, go hunting, kill little animals, but not wear a bit of clothing (the burqa)&#8230;</p>
<p>do you see the contradictions there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne T</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>Modernity:

Clearly, you didn't read what I wrote. 

There are legal sanctions that are well short of criminalization that can come into play, both to protect women and girls from being pressured into wearing the beastly things and to protect the public good and I suggested a few of them.

Wearing a burqa out in public or while operating a vehicle or equipment is a safety hazard to the wearer; they can't see properly and the yardage can be easily caught in an escalator or other moving mechanisms. 

Compelling a female child to wear one out in summer's heat is plain cruel.

The burqa has certainly been used by criminals as a means of concealing identity.

The administation of justice has also been impacted by women refusing to testify unveiled who cry that their human rights are being abrogated when a judge insists on being able to see their faces while they give testimony in open court.

The fact that it isn't easy to develop legal means of protecting individual and communal rights isn't a reason for saying we should do nothing save than decrying the wearing of the burqa as medieval practice and hope this will suffice to bring about change in a community that aspires to drag every last one of us back to the 7th century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modernity:</p>
<p>Clearly, you didn&#8217;t read what I wrote. </p>
<p>There are legal sanctions that are well short of criminalization that can come into play, both to protect women and girls from being pressured into wearing the beastly things and to protect the public good and I suggested a few of them.</p>
<p>Wearing a burqa out in public or while operating a vehicle or equipment is a safety hazard to the wearer; they can&#8217;t see properly and the yardage can be easily caught in an escalator or other moving mechanisms. </p>
<p>Compelling a female child to wear one out in summer&#8217;s heat is plain cruel.</p>
<p>The burqa has certainly been used by criminals as a means of concealing identity.</p>
<p>The administation of justice has also been impacted by women refusing to testify unveiled who cry that their human rights are being abrogated when a judge insists on being able to see their faces while they give testimony in open court.</p>
<p>The fact that it isn&#8217;t easy to develop legal means of protecting individual and communal rights isn&#8217;t a reason for saying we should do nothing save than decrying the wearing of the burqa as medieval practice and hope this will suffice to bring about change in a community that aspires to drag every last one of us back to the 7th century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j. dyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5559</link>
		<dc:creator>j. dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5559</guid>
		<description>modernityblog 
 "Sorry, but I think as SocRep states above, legal means are a very poor method of doing away with the Burqa."

I disagree, Modernity.

I think it's going to be up to the courts to decide that issue, in this country at least. 

In any case, I know of no case where people were allowed to participate in public affairs (voting, driving, cashing checks, etc.) with their faced covered. 


btw: sun glasses and motor cycle helmets are not face coverings and are function specific. Eye patches become part of a persons identity and do not cover the whole face, Douglas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>modernityblog<br />
 &#8220;Sorry, but I think as SocRep states above, legal means are a very poor method of doing away with the Burqa.&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree, Modernity.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s going to be up to the courts to decide that issue, in this country at least. </p>
<p>In any case, I know of no case where people were allowed to participate in public affairs (voting, driving, cashing checks, etc.) with their faced covered. </p>
<p>btw: sun glasses and motor cycle helmets are not face coverings and are function specific. Eye patches become part of a persons identity and do not cover the whole face, Douglas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modernityblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5558</link>
		<dc:creator>modernityblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5558</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I think as SocRep states above, legal means are a very poor method of doing away with the Burqa.

It is an illusion of a solution.

Legalistic means make people feel happy "ah, we've got a law for that", etc

But as you suggest, we are going around in circles, I shall leave you with that fine old expression:

&lt;blockquote&gt;"We need to beware the  tyranny of the majority."&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I think as SocRep states above, legal means are a very poor method of doing away with the Burqa.</p>
<p>It is an illusion of a solution.</p>
<p>Legalistic means make people feel happy &#8220;ah, we&#8217;ve got a law for that&#8221;, etc</p>
<p>But as you suggest, we are going around in circles, I shall leave you with that fine old expression:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We need to beware the  tyranny of the majority.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas, Sao Paulo</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5555</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas, Sao Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5555</guid>
		<description>Your argument about white shirts for men doesn't hold water, as I'm sure you must realise yourself. But you're right to the extent that it's going to be difficult to define exactly what is allowed and what isn't. No masks to be worn in public, the face to be fully exposed at all times? Then what about motorcycle helmets? Or sunglasses? What about Moshe Dayan-style eyepatches? Or people who temporarily need to wear a bandage? And so on and so on ...

As for state-enforced dress codes, they exist everywhere, not only in Saudi Arabia. Even where they are not state-enforced, society at large sets its own rules. In a seaside resort it’s all right for both men and women to go out and do their shopping in their beachwear, but in a city miles from the nearest beach those same men and women would naturally cover up more, and not just because of the weather. You must have noticed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument about white shirts for men doesn&#8217;t hold water, as I&#8217;m sure you must realise yourself. But you&#8217;re right to the extent that it&#8217;s going to be difficult to define exactly what is allowed and what isn&#8217;t. No masks to be worn in public, the face to be fully exposed at all times? Then what about motorcycle helmets? Or sunglasses? What about Moshe Dayan-style eyepatches? Or people who temporarily need to wear a bandage? And so on and so on &#8230;</p>
<p>As for state-enforced dress codes, they exist everywhere, not only in Saudi Arabia. Even where they are not state-enforced, society at large sets its own rules. In a seaside resort it’s all right for both men and women to go out and do their shopping in their beachwear, but in a city miles from the nearest beach those same men and women would naturally cover up more, and not just because of the weather. You must have noticed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petra</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2009/06/the-state-and-the-burqa/#comment-5554</link>
		<dc:creator>Petra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=1333#comment-5554</guid>
		<description>This debate is just going around in circles, and jdyer's example with the swastika indeed is a good illustration that nobody has addressed.
The burqa question is ultimately not about clothing, it's about discrimination and oppression of women, as is of course the Saudi dress code. That's why I said in my first post here, the law should say that the practice of women walking around as anonymous piles of textiles is rooted in a culture that is deeply discriminatory against women, and the complete erasing of any trace of individuality that is the result of covering the face will not be accepted in the West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This debate is just going around in circles, and jdyer&#8217;s example with the swastika indeed is a good illustration that nobody has addressed.<br />
The burqa question is ultimately not about clothing, it&#8217;s about discrimination and oppression of women, as is of course the Saudi dress code. That&#8217;s why I said in my first post here, the law should say that the practice of women walking around as anonymous piles of textiles is rooted in a culture that is deeply discriminatory against women, and the complete erasing of any trace of individuality that is the result of covering the face will not be accepted in the West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

