
This is a cross-post by Mark Gardner from the new - and hugely welcome - blog of the Community Security Trust in the UK. While you’re there, see also Dave Rich’s inaugural post. “This blog will try to shed some light on the nature of contemporary antisemitism, but also on the good work being done to combat it,” he says.
An article in today’s Independent by the paper’s Washington correspondent, David Usborne, contains a stunning example of the conflation of Jews with Israel.
A double page spread on President Obama’s Cairo speech is headlined, “President stings Israel with swipe at settlements”. The sub-title tells us how brave this is, “White House shows willingness to ignore US Jewish lobby by risking confrontation with Netanyahu over Palestinian statehood”.
The opening paragraph tells us breathlessly:
THE CORDS [sic] that connect Israel to the United States were under unprecedented strain last night after Barack Obama risked the wrath of the Jewish lobby in the US by publicly chiding Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…
Two paragraphs later, we hear that “Mr Obama showed he is willing, perhaps more than any US president before him, to ignore the Jewish lobby domestically by getting firm with Israel. Thus he made public a festering and personal argument with Mr Netanyahu, who is refusing to heed his demands for a halt to all new settlements in the occupied West Bank”.
So, according to the Independent’s US correspondent and headline writers:
- The “US Jewish lobby” backs Netanyahu and West Bank settlers. Indeed, it is basically synonymous with such right-wing ideology; and a mere “chiding” of Netanyahu risks incurring its “wrath”. (Err…but what about the polling results on all these issues, and the 78% Jewish vote for Obama in the election?)
- Obama’s Cairo speech is most notable for his willingness to confront the US Jewish lobby. (The US Jewish lobby is the most important thing in all of this? It has more “wrath” than any other player?)
- Obama’s Cairo speech shows he is “willing, perhaps more than any US president before him, to ignore the Jewish lobby domestically”. (Suez anyone?)
And the relationship between “THE CORDS that connect Israel to the United States” and the wrathful Jewish lobby with some kind of hold over all Obama’s predecessors is what exactly?
The Independent ought to explain itself, and quickly.

“Obama’s Cairo speech is most notable for his willingness to confront the US Jewish lobby. (The US Jewish lobby is the most important thing in all of this? It has more “wrath” than any other player?)”
Really” I am a member of the Jewish lobby and didn’t find the speech on the whole objectionable.
I actually liked Obama’s challenge to the Palestinians to stop using violence.
Does the Independent have anything to say about that?
Does the paper have anything to say about the non democratic characted of most of the Arab world which Obama also criticized?
welcome to the CST blog!
Jacob,
This is the narrative that anti-Israel elements in the media will be trying to establish in the coming years: the alleged breaking down of the special relationship…