Michael Ignatieff, leader of Canada’s Liberal Party and the author of several books on international politics and human rights (including the highly recommended Virtual War), has written an op-ed for the National Post slamming Israel Apartheid Week.
He writes:
Throughout our history, Canadians have strived to understand each other across the solitudes that have broken other countries to pieces. Our common national purpose has been built on our diversity.
We respect differences — of opinion, nationality, race and creed. We abandon that respect at our peril.
“Israel Apartheid Week” (IAW), now underway on university campuses across Canada, betrays the values of mutual respect that Canada has always promoted.
International law defines “apartheid” as a crime against humanity. Labelling Israel as an “apartheid” state is a deliberate attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish state itself.
Criticism of Israel is legitimate. Attempting to describe its very existence as a crime against humanity is not.
IAW is part of a global campaign of proclamations, boycotts and calls for divestment, which originated in the World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance held in Durban, South Africa, in 2001. Like “Durban I,” IAW singles out one state, its citizens and its supporters for condemnation and exclusion, and it targets institutions and individuals because of what and who they are — Israeli and Jewish.
IAW goes beyond reasonable criticism into demonization. It leaves Jewish and Israeli students wary of expressing their opinions, for fear of intimidation.
No Canadian should ever have to fear for their safety in a public space because of who they are or what they believe. All Canadians should condemn any attempt to intimidate anyone in the legitimate affirmation of their beliefs and identity.
The Ontario wing of the Canadian Union of Public Employees has joined the chorus of denunciations of Israel on our campuses. The CUPE Ontario resolution passed last week to boycott Israeli academics is an unacceptable violation of academic freedom.
Canada enjoys strong academic, economic and cultural ties with Israel and Israeli institutions, and these relationships benefit both our countries. Collaborative research between Canadian and Israeli academics is mutually rewarding, and should be encouraged. The CUPE resolution is an attack on the free exchange that is at the heart of our university system.
The Liberal Party of Canada condemns the CUPE resolution in the strongest possible terms. I salute the others who have spoken out against the resolution, including my colleagues on both sides of the aisle in the House of Commons, and CUPE’s national president, Paul Moist, who has refused to support the resolution. I encourage all CUPE members, and all Canadians, to follow their example.
Israel Apartheid Week and CUPE Ontario’s anti-Israel posturing exploit academic freedom, and they should be condemned by all who value civil and respectful debate about the tragic conflict in the Middle East.
Political leaders should also take care not to deepen the distrust between Canadian communities over the Middle East. Politicians who use the ongoing conflict in the Middle East as a wedge to divide Canadians for their own political gain can succeed only in accentuating acrimony and deepening tensions.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict evokes passionate disagreement. It should not damage academic freedom and it should not divide Canadian communities. We can move forward if we work together to promote the common objective of Canadian policy ever since 1948 — a secure Israel living side-by-side in peace with an independent Palestine.
I’m glad Iggy has issued this strong statement and hope it helps dump Syd Ryan (and the likeminded) out of the leadership of CUPE and out of the Ontario legislature.
As Israel’s Bedouin Consul General to Pacific-Northwest US said so elequently in the pages of the San Fran Chronicle, the false rhetoric does a huge disservice to both.
I attended a lecture he gave a few years before he entered Canadian politics at a synagogue in Toronto around the time he had published a new book and took great issue with him referring to the occupied territories as “bantustans”.
Palestinians living in the West Bank are not free to move around the West Bank. They are not allowed to travel on roads in the West Bank that are exclusive for the Israelis. There is an Apartheid Wall that infringes upon the West Bank that cuts Palestinians off from their towns, farmland, and families. In effect, the Palestinians are living in Bantustans.
Arab population of Israel: 20%
Jewish population of areas controlled by the Palestinian authority or Hamas: 0%
Tell me again, who’s practicing apartheid?
Brian:
Congrats on your efforts to get the CBC to moderate comments.
Did you read Judy Rebick’s ignorant support of Rick Salutin in the Saturday letters section of the Globe? I’m thinking of posting a response to our “as a Jew working for peace”, citing Ismael Khaldi’s response regarding Israel Apartheid Week, etc. that appeared in the San Fran Chronicle.
I do not remember the Germans being allowed to move freely about their country during the Cold War either nor an absence of checkponntso teh Ulster border in the “Troubles;” and in the months of the Battle of Britain and of the pre-D-Day assembly, large swathes of England South of the Thames, were closed to non-residents and visitors. For over thirty years after 1967 both Arabs and Jews could move freely about the Districts of Hebron and Nablus - till Arafat and friends but with friends like that…. started their permanent muqawama war.
Of more political pertinence, what sort of trade unionists and left politics is it to associate with a bunch of theocrats who oppose representative voting and democracy on principle? Who wish to run their government exclusively on canon law? Besides viciously enforcing their authoprity with bombs, beatings lynchings and…even formal death penalties???