WTF? Whoever spoke about Rumsfeld’s moral authority?

I’m just pointing out that you didn’t speak out against Rumsfeld’s Nazi analogy against Chávez, while you would most certainly write a long, angry post if a Nazi analogy were used against Olmert.

Of course, there’s nothing wrong with that. But there’s nothing wrong with denouncing Israel’s atrocities without denouncing Russia’s, either.

You should. You’d feel right at home there.

“But Chávez has been scrutinized by more relevant people, such as US Government officials. The American Defense Secretary said in 2006: “He’s a person who was elected legally — just as Adolf Hitler was elected legally.”

You think Rumsfeld has some kind of moral authority to judge Chávez. You’re full of surprises.

None of the Zionist bloggers who continually sermonize us about the misuse of Nazi analogies complained about a Nazi analogy being used against Chávez.

On the subject of our friend Feinmann, I notice you didn’t respond to my comments on your comments. I wonder why…

Talking seriously, the day Russia claims to have “the most moral army in the world,” I promise you I’ll be the first to denounce it does not.

People who boast of holding the moral high ground are usually more closely scrutinized than those who admit to being like everyone else; and it’s reasonable.