<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sari Nusseibeh on Z Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.z-word.com/2008/04/sari-nusseibeh-on-z-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2008/04/sari-nusseibeh-on-z-word/</link>
	<description>Commentary about Zionism, anti-Zionism, antisemitism and the conflict in the Middle East</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5-RC1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lbnaz</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2008/04/sari-nusseibeh-on-z-word/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>lbnaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=90#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Appropos for an article about Sari Nusseibeh's antipathy to revanchist sloganeers is Hillel Cohen's important book about the history of Arab collaboration with Zionists. Reviewed here by Benny Morris:

http://www.tnr.com/story_print.html?id=0e100478-298c-438c-a994-e1800474ad19</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appropos for an article about Sari Nusseibeh&#8217;s antipathy to revanchist sloganeers is Hillel Cohen&#8217;s important book about the history of Arab collaboration with Zionists. Reviewed here by Benny Morris:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tnr.com/story_print.html?id=0e100478-298c-438c-a994-e1800474ad19" rel="nofollow">http://www.tnr.com/story_print.html?id=0e100478-298c-438c-a994-e1800474ad19</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.z-word.com/2008/04/sari-nusseibeh-on-z-word/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.z-word.com/?p=90#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Anthony David is right - Nusseibeh is a mass of contradictions. Unlike him, however, I never felt that these contradictions resolve themselves. The book does not passionately advocate two states, indeed Nusseibeh seems to seesaw between one and two states. I never understood what the essence of Palestinian nationalism was all about. Neither did I feel Nusseibeh had much empathy for Jews - who were always described as Russian upstarts. He admired  Abu Jihad who the Israelis would probably not hesitate to describe as a terrorist.  I was no closer to understanding what made Nusseibeh tick at the end of the book than at the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony David is right - Nusseibeh is a mass of contradictions. Unlike him, however, I never felt that these contradictions resolve themselves. The book does not passionately advocate two states, indeed Nusseibeh seems to seesaw between one and two states. I never understood what the essence of Palestinian nationalism was all about. Neither did I feel Nusseibeh had much empathy for Jews - who were always described as Russian upstarts. He admired  Abu Jihad who the Israelis would probably not hesitate to describe as a terrorist.  I was no closer to understanding what made Nusseibeh tick at the end of the book than at the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
